Can We Drink Socially?

If you are trying to decide which problem society has the most trouble facing, chances are social drinking will not cross your mind. But, we must deal with social drinking because it is problematic to our society. For people who realize that they must face God in the judgment for their actions (2 Corinthians 5:10), the question must be, “What does the Bible say?”

This article is not intended to discuss drunkenness. The Bible gives incontrovertible evidence that drunkenness is sinful (Galatians 5:19-21; Ephesians 5:18; Luke 21:34; Romans 13:13; 1 Thessalonians 5:7-8). It is hard to find anyone who will argue the fact that drunkenness is right. However, it is more difficult to convince someone that social drinking is sinful. This is primarily because millions of people see social drinking as acceptable, as long as it is not combined with blatant negligence (i.e. driving an automobile while drinking).

By “social drinking,” I do not mean that someone who is a social drinker is going to habitually get drunk. I have seen several articles that claim if someone takes one drink, they will end up being a rapist, murderer, have a broken home, etc. That is not a fair assumption. There are those who occasionally drink a beer, glass of wine, whiskey, vodka, etc., after work, with dinner, or during a special occasion without getting anywhere near even the legal definition of “drunk.” Even though this does not appear to contradict biblical teaching, we will see that the Bible gives us sufficient principles to determine that this is indeed wrong.

It still amazes me to see Christians who do not believe that there is anything wrong with taking a drink or two occasionally. Many people say, “Well, didn’t Jesus make wine and didn’t He drink at social functions?” This is a bastion of defense for alcoholic beverages by drinkers, whether Christian or not. Even after seeing all the problems alcohol can cause, the “social drinker” will quip, “the Bible condemns drunkenness, but it does not condemn social drinking.” Sadly, if one searches several Bible dictionaries and commentaries, they will find religious scholars on the side of being against drunkenness, but for drinking. But the question with which we must concern ourselves is, “What does the Bible say?”

The Definition Of Wine In The Bible

The universally accepted definition of “wine” as “fermented grape juice” may well explain why many Bible believing Christians have come to believe that the “wine” mentioned in the Bible must in all instances be alcoholic. This assumption, known as the “one wine theory,” has greatly prejudiced the study of the Biblical teachings on the use of alcoholic beverages by leading many sincere Christians to believe that God approves the moderate use of fermented, intoxicating wine. “The problem,” as Robert Teachout points out, “is that people have taken the very usual meaning of the word (whether in Hebrew, Greek, Latin or English) -- as an intoxicating beverage -- and have made it the only definition of the word.” This comment is typical of many because they regard wine as being just what our present day dictionaries say: “The fermented juice of the grapes, used as an alcoholic beverage, and in cooking, religious ceremonies, etc.”

The Hebrew word yayin and the Greek word oinos are the two most frequent words used to denote “wine.” According to Robert Teachout’s tabulation of the 141 references to yayin in the Old Testament, 71 times the word refers to unfermented grape juice and 70 times to fermented wine. This is sufficient to establish that yayin is sometimes used in the Old Testament to refer to strong drink (Genesis 9:20-21; 19:32-33; 1 Samuel 25:36-37) and sometimes it refers to the unfermented juice of the grape (Isaiah 16:10; Jeremiah 40:10-12; Nehemiah 13:15; Lamentations 2:12). The juice of grapes, also known as must, was generally declared to be a gift from God or a blessing (Proverbs 3:10). On the other hand, wine is declared to be a curse (Proverbs 4:17; 20:1). The Bible does not leave us in the dark about making the distinction as when to drink wine or non-alcoholic must, or grape juice, and when not to drink wine or fermented liquor (Proverbs 23:31-32). The statement in Proverbs clearly teaches us not to look on or use wine after it has gone through the process of fermentation by which alcohol is produced. Therefore, in light of the fact that the word of God distinguishes between good wine (non-alcoholic) and bad wine (alcoholic) and condemns the latter, it must be denied that God condones the drinking of alcoholic wine or any other hard liquor even in moderation.

The Greek word oinos is used in the Septuagint to translate the generic Hebrew word yayin, which means the juice of grapes at various stages. But oinos is also used to translate the Hebrew tirosh, which definitely means fresh juice of the grapes, must, or new wine. In fact, oinos, which is used for “wine” 28 out of 29 times in the New Testament, is defined as “must, grape juice, or new wine.”

The definitions of “wine” from older English dictionaries suggests that when the King James Version of the Bible was produced (1604-1611), its translators must have understood “wine” to refer to both fermented and unfermented wine. In view of this fact, the King James Version’s uniform translation of the Hebrew yayin and Greek oinos as “wine” was an acceptable translation at that time, since in those days the term could mean either fermented or unfermented wine, just as the words it translates (yayin or oinos) can mean either. Today, however, when “wine” has assumed the sole meaning of fermented grape juice, modern translations of the Bible should indicate whether the text is dealing with fermented or unfermented grape juice. By failing to provide this clarification, uninformed Bible readers are misled into believing that all references to “wine” in the Bible refer to fermented grape juice.

In the New Testament times, wine mixed with water was the primary table beverage in the Roman Empire. The main ratio for mixing wine and water was three parts water to one part wine. This greatly reduced any intoxicating effect; however, it was still possible to become drunk. Usually, diluted wine would have had a significant effect on the bladder far before the brain. One of the reasons wine was used so prevalently in Roman times was that water was very dangerous to drink without purifying it with wine used as a cleansing agent.

The Preservation Of Grape Juice

Contrary to popular opinion, the problems the ancients encountered in preserving fermented wine were as great as, if not greater than, those faced in preserving unfermented grape juice. To prevent fermented wine from spoiling, vintners used a host of preservatives such as salt, seawater, pitch, boiled-down must, marble dust, lime, sulfur fumes, and crushed iris. In comparison to preserving fermented wine, preserving grape juice unfermented was a simpler process. The ancients had three main methods of preserving the juice of the grape:

  • Boiling: This reduced the juice to concentrate, which was then diluted with water.
  • Filtration: This method used thick wool to filter out the particles which included the yeast, therefore stopping the fermentation process.
  • Cold preservation: This method involved sealing the juice in jars and submerging it in cold water. This would keep the temperature of the must below 45 degrees and prevent fermentation. After the solid particles had settled, it would not ferment even if taken from the cold water.

It is also noteworthy that the ancients did not have sugar as we do and they were far more interested in having a sweet drink than we are because we have so many. However, the process of fermentation destroys the sugar in the juices of the grape by turning it into alcohol. This naturally would have been undesirable to them. The ancients looked for the quality of sweetness in their drinks rather than alcoholic exhilaration.

Jesus And Wine

The belief that the wine Christ provided in Cana was alcoholic rests on five major assumptions: First, it is assumed that the word oinos indicates only “fermented-quality grape drink.” Second, it is assumed that since the word oinos is used in reference both to the wine which ran out and the wine that Christ made, both wines must have been alcoholic. Third, it is assumed that the Jews did not know how to prevent the fermentation of grape juice; and since, the season of the wedding was just before the Passover (John 2:13), that is, six months after the grape harvest, the wine used at Cana had ample time to ferment. Fourth, it is assumed that the description given by the master of the banquet to the wine provided by Christ as “the good wine” means a high-quality alcoholic wine. Fifth, it is assumed that the expression “well drunk” (John 2:10), used by the master of the banquet, indicates that the guests were intoxicated because they had been drinking fermented wine. Consequently, the wine Jesus made must also have been fermented.

It was customary to bring out the freshest wine at the beginning of the feast. As the wine ran low, the older wine was brought out. In John 2:10, the master of the feast made the comment that Jesus had saved the good wine until now (near the end of the festivities). This “good wine” was the fresh, sweet must or unfermented wine. New wine is not intoxicating until some time after the process of fermentation has set in. Fermentation is a process of decay. There is not a hint that our Lord produced alcohol, which is a product of decay and death. He produced a living wine uncontaminated by fermentation.

It is against the principle of scriptural and moral analogy to suppose that Christ would exert His supernatural power to bring into existence an intoxicating wine which scripture condemns as “a mocker” and “a brawler” (Proverbs 20:1) and which the Holy Spirit has chosen as the symbol of divine wrath. Scriptural and moral consistency require that “the good wine” produced by Christ was fresh, unfermented grape juice. In fact, the adjective used to describe the wine made by Christ is kalos, which means “that which is morally excellent or befitting.” The term is suggestive of the characterization of unintoxicating wine as moral (ethikos) wine.

Social Drinking In The New Testament

People who seek to justify social drinking because the Bible does not specifically condemn it are mistaken. Notice two examples: First, the word for “banquetings” in 1 Peter 4:3 is the Greek word potos which was the ancient practice of social drinking. R. C. Trench states that this word means “the drinking bout, the banquet, the symposium, not of necessity excessive (Genesis 19:3; 2 Samuel 3:20; Esther 6:14), but giving opportunity for excess (1 Samuel 25:36).” Peter made a specific reference to drunkenness and drinking parties, condemning them both! Second, the irony of the mockers’ charge that on the day of Pentecost the apostles were drunk on gleukos, that is, on the grape juice which apparently was their common beverage (Acts 2:13), provides an indirect proof of their abstinence from fermented grape juice. There would have been no point in the mockers’ attributing the cause of the disciples’ strange actions to unfermented grape juice if it was not common knowledge that the apostles abstained from intoxicating wine. The intended jibe was that the disciples were such dimwits they got drunk on grape juice!

In the New Testament, purity has always been a major aspect of a Christian’s life (1 Timothy 4:12; 5:22; 2 Timothy 2:22; Romans 12:1). Do you believe a loose attitude concerning social drinking would meet God’s requirements for purity? Furthermore, consider two statements in Jesus’ sermon on the mount. In Matthew 5:21-22, Jesus not only condemned murder but He went beyond the overt crime of killing and stated that anyone who has a malicious and wicked attitude is a murderer. Also, in Matthew 5:27-28, Jesus not only condemned adultery but He went to the heart of the problem and stated that someone commits adultery even if they look upon a woman and lust. Considering the way Jesus taught on these two subjects, how do you think He would feel about social drinking?

In Philippians 2:5, Paul said, “Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus.” Specifically, Paul was writing about humility but the principle can apply to all phases of being a Christian. We should be diligent to have the same attitude Jesus did toward all subjects. The holidays are coming up and it is a common time for social drinking to take place. A very appropriate question is, “Could you see Jesus engaging in social or occasional drinking?” If we are going to have the attitude of Christ, then we have to ask ourselves these questions!